AI Project of the Year
The overall winner. The project that best combines responsible AI, real adoption, measurable outcomes, and delivery rigor.
AI-Driven Project Management Revolution
A new AIPM community initiative
A global recognition for teams applying AI responsibly inside real, delivered project work. Free end-to-end, judged online, built by practitioners for practitioners.
Join the interest list Nominations open mid-August 2026
Plenty of awards celebrate AI products. Plenty of awards celebrate project delivery. Almost none look at both at once: was the AI responsibly governed, genuinely adopted by the people it serves, and delivered with real project discipline? That intersection is where this award lives.
The AIPM AI Project of the Year Award recognizes AI-enabled projects that demonstrate responsible innovation, strong delivery, measurable value, human-centered adoption, and positive organizational or societal impact. Every finalist case becomes community learning: a published story the whole profession can borrow from.
A single submission covers everything: the jury designates the two special recognitions from the same finalist pool, with no extra entry burden.
The overall winner. The project that best combines responsible AI, real adoption, measurable outcomes, and delivery rigor.
The finalist that best demonstrates responsible AI governance, human accountability, and trustworthiness.
Awarded where a finalist applies agentic or autonomous AI responsibly. If no entry qualifies, it is simply not awarded in edition one.
The full rules, rubric, and eligibility publish when nominations open. The essentials are already set:
Four principles are hard constraints on the design, and the integrity rules publish alongside the rubric.
Proven award mechanics, AIPM's own identity, naming, and criteria.
Free end-to-end. Winning cannot be bought, and proof of winning is never paywalled.
Real, delivered, or operationalized project work. Not ideas, demos, models, or tools alone.
Finalist feedback and published case studies make the whole community better, win or not.
Judging integrity: a published jury and conflict-of-interest policy, no contact with judges during judging, human-authored submissions, and judges who score evidence, not claims.
Planning to nominate a project? Interested in judging? Want to help spread the word? Join the interest list and you will hear from us the moment nominations open.
Working-team documents behind this page. This block is for the validation loop only and is not part of the public launch page.